The duplicitous nature of the UK government

The duplicitous nature of the UK government continues as they say one thing and then do another. The UK government has repeatedly mixed messages about issuing a vaccine passport.[1]  Over the past year, ministers have stated that they would issue immunity passports,[2] or at one point, immunity certificates [3] [4] that would allow immune people to have greater freedom of movement.[5] [6] [7] However, speculation of a covid-passport that would prevent people, who refused the vaccine, having access to pubs, restaurants, or to fly has caused a significant public outcry. Such moves would create an apartheid system; causing the vaccine minister to give clarity on the matter.

Britain’s vaccines minister announced Monday that the government will definitely not mandate the coronavirus shot, and that it has no plans to introduce immunity passports, or place restrictions on those who do not take the jab.[8]

However, months later, the UK government has u-turned, reneging on its promise not to issue vaccine passports. Following in the steps of other countries,[9] [10]the government is now trailing a vaccine passport. The passport created by biometrics firm iProve and cybersecurity firm Mvine, will be issued as a free app., allowing people to prove they have the vaccine. But why do they need to prove they are vaccinated if people are not going to be treated differently?[11]

Nadhim Zahawi warned many businesses would likely require proof of the jabs once they become available, in the same way they now ask customers to check-in using QR codes.[12] 

Furthermore, Alexandra Phelan, a member of the Center for Global Health Science and Security at Georgetown University, outlines in The Lancet that introducing a vaccine passport would exacerbate already prevalent societal inequalities. It would create a two-tier society; those who can have full access and those with reduced access and ability to engage within society. Such a move could go against a person’s human rights and anti-discriminatory laws, especially if a person cannot take the vaccine due to health reasons or pregnancy.[13]

Although governments may not impose such restrictive movements, they could be deemed complicit and sanctioning by neglect if they do not prevent businesses from discriminating. This is especially crucial as governments have stated they will not impose such restrictions, but a business may, thus, questioning if the governments are allowing or signalling to companies that they will not stop such action. However, only time will tell. Could the vaccine passport act as an enforcement tool, in effect mandating the vaccine by stealth? We already see Australia has adopted a ‘no jab, no pay’ law, as parents who refuse to inoculate their children are ineligible to claim child and tax benefits.[14] Additionally, Gladys Berejiklian, New South Wales Premier, has announced that the government is considering implementing measures that would prohibit residents who have not been vaccinated from having access to specific venues.[15] Berejiklian stated:

The measures would be aimed at ‘incentivising’ uptake of the vaccine, which is vital to rebooting the economy, and businesses may require patrons to prove they had received the jab.[16]

Such moves are akin to Nazi Germany’s treatment of Jews. However, the question is, will other governments follow suit, or will they condemn such actions? I believe we will see such sanctions placed on people, not only in the UK but also globally, as those who reject the vaccine will be vilified and deemed a conspiracy theorist – a group that will be portrayed as endangering the collective and further spreading the virus; one that can be treated without a vaccine![17] [18] Furthermore, we are already seeing companies seeking to implement mandatory covid-19 vaccinations for their employees. Yet, one has to question why one-fifth of health care workers are refusing the vaccine?[19]

If companies mandate staff to take the covid-19 vaccine, could employees take legal action against the company in the event of any adverse effects? The sad reality is that while companies are pushing the vaccine and threatening staff who do not take them with disciplinary action, they make staff sign a disclaimer that they have taken the vaccine of their own volition. But many employees do not take the vaccine freely; they take it out of fear of losing their jobs and not being able to provide for their families.

Furthermore, could we see the vaccine passport linked to a person’s credit score, creating something similar to China’s social credit system? While such a move sounds impossible, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has proposed linking a person’s internet searches to their credit score. Thus, this would replace traditional credit scoring with advanced AI-powered processes that incorporate your online activity and instil conformity to the government’s edicts.[20] Before you discard what I have suggested, who would have thought that people would be incarcerated in their own homes for a year or be prevented from visiting their families in draconian state-sanctioned measures to fight a virus, a virus that is so dangerous that most people do not know they have it and therefore need to be told that they have.

But what about the dangers of taking the vaccine? Norway has adjusted vaccine advice[21] due to seeing an increase in deaths amongst those who have taken the vaccine; up to 30 deaths are attributed to the covid-19 vaccine.[22] Additionally, two cases of healthy women, [23] [24] who were both healthy before the vaccine, now have repeated body spasms – something I reported could happen due to the hydrogel within the vaccine that attaches to the central nervous system.[25]  Furthermore, a Florida doctor died after having the vaccine, and a health professional died two days after receiving the first jab?[26] These are, but a few cases of deaths and adverse effects people have had from taking the vaccine. Please pray for them that God will move in their lives and intervene.

Personally, I urge people to check out the facts before deciding on having the vaccine so that you make an informed decision; especially as the UK government has signed waivers preventing manufactures from all litigation![27] Remember, you cannot untake the vaccine once administered! But why is the government filtering information on coronavirus and the vaccine? Furthermore, why can people not speak out and highlight the risks? Why has the government not informed people that they cannot take legal action if the vaccine hurts them? Why is the government utilising the military cyber warfare and psyop unit 77 Brigade to censor what they deem as being misinformation – conspiratorial? Is the government using the fear within society and the mutant strain to push the vaccine through an elaborate marketing campaign? Now I know that sounds conspiratorial, but the government has employed a marketing company to disseminate its message, in an endeavour to saturate all media platforms.

Thus, has the UK government employed a state-sanctioned psyop on its people? On the 2nd March 2020, the UK government struck a deal with London-based OMD Group worth £119 million. The agreement was for OMD to assist in the government’s Covid-19 marketing campaign in disseminating information on all media platforms, both nationally and internationally.[28] Despite committing to spend such a large sum of money, an amount that dwarfed the 46million spent on getting people ready for Brexit, the government at this point had not taken any lockdown measures, nor closed schools, or banned gatherings of large numbers.[29]

The significant spend on advertising weeks before the government implemented a national lockdown could be seen on one level as a failure by the government to act promptly. The deal’s preparation would have been made several weeks before the agreement was ratified on the 2nd March 2020. However, was the government planning a national lockdown when instructing the marketing campaign? While seeking to highlight measures people needed to take in order to keep safe, the campaign was also commissioned to communicate the emergency economic measures to the public. Therefore, was the government using its advertising campaign to prime people in a state-sanctioned psyop, so they would accept a national lockdown?[30]

Repeatedly the British government has stated that they do not want a lockdown or any further lockdowns, but then the next minute we find that we are in one. Why is this? Is it so the government can save face and blame it on the statistics, data that has already been proven to be inaccurate and wrong.

Personally, at this juncture, I have little trust in the government, and I am concerned about what the future may look like next year, a concern I am not on my own in expressing. But why are the churches not speaking out? Why are they not discussing both for and against viewpoints on the vaccine? However, instead, they promote the vaccine advising their parishes to take it[31] in an expression of loving their neighbour and loving themselves;[32] a stance that is a perversion of theology that does not withstand the scrutiny of the totality of scripture, for our bodies are the temple of God, and therefore, we should be careful what we allow to enter them.

Furthermore, we are to love God first and then our neighbour as ourselves. To bypass God, negates what you do for your neighbour. Moreover, laying your life down for a friend is different from taking a vaccine. You lay it down, so that people can come to faith, not in order to create immunity, if any is achieved, by taking the vaccine.

We are living in extraordinary times. A period when right is portrayed as wrong, good as evil; something the Bible warned. Yet, we must be careful and test everything, even what I say, against the word of God. Please do not merely take what people say. Do your own research.

So why does the world seem to be in so much chaos? The reality is that what we are experiencing is what the Bible outlined would take place before Jesus Christ’s return. We are at the dawn of what the Bible refers to as ‘The Great Tribulation’, a period when the world is given over to the evil desires of its heart, and to the devil – the antichrist who will govern the earth. We will soon witness plagues, famine, pestilence, wars, rumours of wars, global persecution of Christians and several natural disasters.[33]  Why? Because humanity chose to live without God and therefore He removed His hand of protection from the earth, but God will protect those who diligently seek His face.

You may say “I do not believe in God”.  Well, let me ask “Have you ever seen the film about Israel’s captivity in Egypt and Moses?” Do you remember how God judged Egypt as He unleashed plagues upon them for the subjugation and enslavement of His people? Well, that is nothing compared to what is going to take place. What God did to Egypt He will do globally, as He judges the nations’ sin and gathers those who love Him unto Himself. While the World Economic Forum is seeking to bring about a Great Reset, that is not the real reset. It is a false reset that will instil a global governance that will enslave humanity to the antichrist system. The real Great Reset is the one God is bringing about, as He restores creation back to how He created it, in a regenesis event – one that will witness Jesus’ return, putting His enemies under His feet. Then Jesus will establish His Kingdom upon the earth.

We are witnessing a cosmic battle for your soul. Therefore, you must choose a side; you either choose God and reject the devil, or choose the devil and reject God. However, your choice will have eternal consequences. You will not be able to say that God is not real when you stand before Him. Therefore, I urge you to seek out the one true God, repent of your sin and surrender your life to Him. Then live your life according to the word of God – the Bible – as you follow the example Jesus set for us. It is the only way – It is the only Truth!

May God bless you and keep you!

[1] James Tapsfield, (1st December 2020). ‘Michael Gove DENIES that Britons will need ‘immunity certificates’ to go to the pub – despite vaccine minister Nadhim Zahawi suggesting they could be required.’ Daily Mail, online, accessed 12th January 2021, available from

[2] Luke Andrews, (30th November 2020). ‘UK’s Covid vaccine minister suggests bars, cinemas and football stadiums could BAN Brits who haven’t had jab as he admits No10 is looking at ‘immunity passports’. Daily Mail, online, accessed 13th January 2021, available from

[3] Ross Ibbetson, (22nd May 2020). ‘Immunity certificates to allow people who have recovered from coronavirus to be freed from social distancing rules are planned by ministers as they order 10 MILLION antibody tests to see who has had it.’ Daily Mail, online, accessed 12th January 2021, available from

[4] Sam Blanchard, (4th December 2020). ‘People are so unlikely to get Covid-19 a second time that they could be given ‘immunity certificates’ after a vaccine or confirmed illness, SAGE says.’ Daily Mail, online, accessed 13th January 2021, available from

[5] Andrews

[6] Ibbetson

[7] Danyal Hussain, (22nd November 2020).’ Britons who test negative for Covid twice in a week are set to receive a ‘freedom pass’ under government scheme that will allow them to live a normal life.’ Daily Mail, online, accessed 12th January 2021, available from

[8] Steve Watson, (15th December 2020). ‘UK Vaccine Minister U-Turn: ‘Absolutely No Plans For COVID Passports’. NewsWars, online, accessed 13th January 2021, available from

[9] Jack Wright, (15th January 2021). ‘ EU leaders to discuss plans to roll-out Covid vaccine passports – while Britons who have received jabs will be offered passports in Government-backed trial.’ Daily Mail, online, accessed 15th January 2021, available from

[10] Michael Cogley, (30th December 2020). ‘Vaccine passports to take off around the world despite critics.’ The Telegraph, online, accessed 12th January 2021, available from

[11] Jack Wright, (12th January 2021). ‘Thousands of Britons who have received their Covid jab ‘will be offered a vaccine passport’ in trial taking place this month – as EU considers plan to bring them in for travel across Europe.’ Daily Mail, online accessed 12th January 2021, available from

[12] Andres.

[13] Alexandra Phelan, (4th May 2020). ‘COVID-19 immunity passports and vaccination certificates: scientific, equitable, and legal challenges.’ The Lancet, 395(10237), 1595-1598.

[14] Laura Perrins, (2nd December 2020). ‘Nothing would fuel anti-vaxx madness more than insisting on ‘jab passports’, writes former barrister LAURA PERRINS.’ Daily Mail, online, accessed 12th January 2021, available from

[15] Tita Smith, (17th January 2021). ‘Anyone without a vaccine could be BANNED from pubs, restaurants and even workplaces under radical new plan.’ Daily mail, online, accessed 17th January 2021, available from

[16] Ibid.

[17] Bitchute, (1st October 2020). ‘Prof. Dolores Cahill 22nd September 2020.’ Bitchute, online, accessed 4th December 2020, available from

[18] Bitchute, (27th October 2020). ‘ CHARLIE’S ANGELS: ⁣DR. JUDY MIKOVITS, DR. ALEXANDRA HENRYON AND PROF. DOLORES CAHILL.’ Bitchute, online, accessed 4th December 2020, available from

[19] Isabella Nikolic, (17th January 2021). ‘Up to a fifth of care home staff have refused offer of Covid vaccine as bosses ask lawyers if they can force carers to have the jab.’ Daily Mail, online, accessed 17th January 2021, available from 

[20] Yuri Gripas, (8th April 2019). ‘IMF researchers propose to have AI use ONLINE history to determine credit rating, in name of ‘inclusion’. RT, online, accessed 12th January 2021, available from

[21] Jack Elsom, (15th January 2021). ‘’ Daily mail, online, available from

[22] The Irish Times, , (16th January 2021). ‘Deaths spur Norway concern at Covid vaccine safety for vulnerable elderly.’ Irish Times, online, accessed 16th January 2021, available from

[23] Ursache und Wirkung, (13th January 2021). ‘vaccination.’ YouTube, accessed 13th January 2021, available from

[24] RT, (18th January 2021). ‘Woman who suffered convulsions after taking Pfizer Covid jab being screened for permanent neurological damage, son tells RT.’ RT, online, accessed 18th January 2021, available from

[25] Nathan Barnard, (18th December 2020). ‘The Coronavirus Vaccine part two– the UK’s saviour or angel of death?’ The portent Times, accessed 12th January 2021, available from

[26] Vaccine Deaths (n.d.). ‘Vaccine deaths.’ Online accessed 17th January 2021, available from

[27] Fred Porter, (6th December 2020). ‘UK government grants Pfizer civil legal indemnity for COVID-19 vaccine.’ Jurist, online accessed 13th January 2021, available from

[28] Simon Foy, (25th October 2020). ‘Government struck £119m Covid advertising deal weeks before first lockdown.’ The Telegraph, online, accessed 12th January 2021, available from

[29] Ibid.

[30] Neil Clark, (28th October 2020). ‘Covid-19 reverse psychology: Did Johnson play the left by ‘pretending’ he didn’t want a lockdown so it could get public support?’ RT news, accessed 12th January 2021, available from

[31] Elim Pentecostal Churches, (12th January 2021). ‘The coronavirus vaccine – informed perspectives.’ YouTube, accessed 12th January 2021, available from

[32] Mark 12:3-31.

[33] Matthew 24.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Please reload

Please Wait